McLaren gained the Constructors’ Championship, and Ferrari, against this, misplaced it. This occurred through the 2024 Formulation 1 racing season. The reason being fairly clear sadly, contemplating the Maranello group’s errors. We’ve got reiterated this exhaustively, we should admit, in a number of articles devoted to the Italian group for a lot of months now. The difficulty stays the identical and revolves across the incapability of the technical group led by Italian aerodynamicist Enrico Cardile, the previous technical director of the Maranello squad, to supply efficient aerodynamic package deal. And by now it’s a well-know indisputable fact that the Spanish Grand Prix was sadly the start of the catastrophe that crippled the Prancing Horse.
The Italian aspect launched a brand new model of the medium-to-high downforce rear wing. However crucial innovation was undoubtedly the ground, an important macro-component for producing aerodynamic load. When such a component is launched on a automobile competing in crucial class of motorsport, it requires efficient on-track validation. Certainly, it isn’t in any respect easy to right away decide whether or not the research performed on the manufacturing facility, between simulator and wind tunnel, have actually resulted in a tangible enchancment. For that reason, on the Circuit de Catalunya in Barcelona, the decision remained undecided.
Nevertheless, between the Austrian Grand Prix and the race weekend in Nice Britain, the solutions got here loud and clear. The brand new flooring of the SF-24 didn’t work as meant. It generated appreciable instability by way of dealing with, eliminating the characteristic of the Ferrari that drivers appreciated most: its predictability. There was important bouncing and, typically talking, nice issue in using the right journey heights. On the Hungarian Grand Prix, a “fast repair” was launched by the Maranello group’s technicians and engineers, which was the truth is a preliminary modification to make this part extra manageable whereas ready for a wholly new flooring, which might solely arrive in Italy for the house race on the Monza circuit.
Within the meantime, six races the place the SF-24 showcased all its limitations. Aggressive situations during which Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz have been pressured into fixed adaptation, yielding no optimistic outcomes. Throughout this a part of the 2024 Formulation 1 season, Ferrari misplaced its probability to win the Constructors’ Championship. Moreover, contemplating Charles Leclerc’s remaining hole of 81 factors to Max Verstappen, the concept that the Monegasque may have competed for the Drivers’ Championship will not be far-fetched in any respect. There’s additionally one other difficulty weighing on the Constructors’ outcomes, the place the ultimate margin was a lot smaller, specifically may Ferrari have gained the Constructors’ with out McLaren’s Mini DRS?
What we’re referring to is carefully inked to the disputes relating to McLaren’s legality. This brings us again to the dialogue in regards to the rear wing. A form of “mini drag discount system,” with which the MCL38 may keep a downforce stage just like Ferrari’s however take pleasure in a transparent benefit in high-speed sections. Basically, drag was diminished due to a specific aeroelasticity of the ingredient, which might barely open on straights even with the drag discount system closed. This benefit was estimated at a high velocity achieve of a minimum of 3 or 4 kilometers per hour, which is clearly not insignificant in any respect.
Inside this state of affairs, there are two interrelated points that increase issues and never only for Ferrari. The primary includes the FIA’s angle following Pink Bull’s report. To begin with, if the Milton Keynes group had not filed a criticism, the MCL38 would have continued utilizing the disputed wing till the top of the 2024 Formulation 1 championship. This highlights the inadequacy of the legislative physique, which makes the principles however is completely incapable of imposing them. Furthermore, as soon as the questionable legality was established, the Worldwide Federation didn’t penalize McLaren.
As an alternative, it politely invited the Woking group to retire the precise part. Moreover, via its technical director, former Ferrari engineer Nicholas Tombazis, it said that sure previous instances couldn’t be verified and due to this fact instantly closed the matter. Sweeping the problem beneath the rug, primarily. That is the FIA’s strategy. Creating such a precedent is very dangerous in Formulation 1. Why? As a result of a group that goes unpunished units an instance for others, which, in flip, will really feel entitled to make use of borderline or outright unlawful options, understanding they may face no penalties.
Nevertheless, in our view, essentially the most critical matter issues the second difficulty that surfaced with the modification to the technical rules for subsequent yr. The regulatory physique launched a change that appears tailored to forestall an analogous or equivalent answer to that utilized by McLaren from being replicated. Beginning in 2025, the flap of the movable wing should adhere to the identical deformation restrictions as the remainder of the bodywork when the drag discount system is inactive. To be even clearer, the regulatory physique added a clause through Article 3.10.10.
There should be a compulsory minimal distance between the 2 components of the rear wing when the drag discount system will not be energetic. Throughout the wingspan, the rear-end profiles should keep a minimal distance between 9.4 and 13 millimeters. This parameter will probably be enforced when the system is inactive, with FIA inspections utilizing a calibrated spherical device to make sure full compliance earlier than official classes. At this level, a query arises and provides us a lot to consider relating to the matter.
Why does the FIA “ban” McLaren’s answer, thus deeming it unlawful, but through the championship selected to miss it and never penalize a group that derived clear advantages? Is that this the usual process? Can we discuss a skewed championship? Simply within the Azerbaijan Grand Prix on the Baku metropolis circuit, the place the MCL38’s “Mini DRS” made the distinction, if we subtract 7 factors from Oscar Piastri (who completed first) and add them to Charles Leclerc, second on the end, the 2 groups would have tied with 659 factors. Furthermore, Ferrari would have had yet one more victory. However sadly, retroactive penalties don’t exist.
— see video above —
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers learn about us
