This month, System 1’s engines could also be off, however the system is in full swing, pondering not solely concerning the current but additionally the longer term. Discussions are ongoing to outline the brand new Concorde Settlement, which is able to regulate the game with the introduction of the brand new 2026 rules, as the present settlement expires subsequent yr.
One of many subjects on the desk is the funds cap. Rumors have circulated a couple of doable rest of value controls, which have made F1 extra sustainable, even for smaller groups. Let’s not neglect that just some years in the past, there was a danger that some groups may go bankrupt.
Liberty Media’s strategy has modified the panorama: because of the work of Stefano Domenicali, President and CEO of F1, the American promoter has introduced the Grands Prix again to the highest of the worldwide sports activities scene, with broader visibility to a brand new technology of followers, cultivated by the Netflix collection “Drive to Survive,” and a large effort on social networks.
On the identical time, the paddock has grow to be a fascinating place for VIPs, and the decade-long settlement F1 signed with LVMH, the French luxurious conglomerate, speaks volumes concerning the repositioning of the GPs, combining report attendance at every circuit with the exclusivity of the occasion for individuals who have the privilege of experiencing the Paddock Membership. On this context, the place all the symptoms are on the rise, the longer term problem must be fought on equal footing. The monetary rules, a 3rd ingredient in a framework that was beforehand solely technical and sporting, have contributed to efficiency leveling among the many vehicles (with 4 totally different groups successful races this yr: Crimson Bull, Ferrari, McLaren, and Mercedes). Nonetheless, the strict funds cap guidelines can create vital disparities in crew administration.
For instance, labor prices can closely influence a crew’s group. In Switzerland, the place Sauber relies (presently reworking into Audi), and in Italy, the place Ferrari is positioned, workers prices are 20–30% greater than in Nice Britain, the place most different groups are primarily based, apart from Haas and Racing Bulls.
Haas has its headquarters in the USA in Kannapolis (North Carolina) and three operational websites (two in Italy: in Maranello with Ferrari and in Varano de’ Melegari with Dallara, and one in Banbury, UK), whereas Racing Bulls is cut up between Faenza and Milton Keynes, and Alpine combines Enstone with Renault’s engine facility in Viry Chatillon. Nonetheless, Alpine’s Paris headquarters shall be deserted because the F1 crew plans to make use of Mercedes buyer engines.
Clearly, primarily based on the numbers cited, there’s a major disparity: Ferrari, Sauber, and to a lesser extent, Racing Bulls and Haas, regardless of having the identical spending capability, are restricted to hiring far fewer workers than the British groups. To fill the required positions for a contemporary F1 crew (round 1,000 individuals for high groups), some develop their workforce with decrease salaries, making it more difficult to compete out there.
The proposal, due to this fact, could be to extend spending capability primarily based on a parameter that not solely displays inflation (there’s already an annual adjustment for buying energy) but additionally considers labor prices.
This may be a good selection that might rebalance values, together with the thought of eliminating the paradox of splitting the price of an worker who would theoretically work part-time for the crew and part-time in different F1 actions (like boats for the America’s Cup or growing Hypercars or highway supercars). With a major annual improve in spending capability, all roles would fall below the F1 crew, avoiding potential loopholes.
The ideas which have emerged are very rational. It is going to be fascinating to see if a real equalization of spending may be achieved.
Purchase official Ferrari F1 merchandise!
Let different Scuderia Followers learn about us
